Zuletzt publiziert

  • Zeitschriftenartikel

    Natürliche Sprachverarbeitung für das Expertensystem ScienceAtlas 

    Funk, Stefan E.
    Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 2004
    Dokument ansehen
  • Zeitschriftenartikel

    FID-Lizenzen sichtbar und suchbar machen: Der Zentrale Nachweis für FID-Lizenzen – Konzept, Umsetzung und Datenmanagement 

    Glaab-Kühn, Friederike; Kittelmann, Maike
    ABI Technik 2018; 38(3) p.234-244
    Mit der wachsenden Zahl an zugänglichen FID-Lizenzen wurde es immer wichtiger, die FIDLizenzen zentral nachzuweisen. Zu diesem Zweck hat das Kompetenzzentrum für Lizenzierung elektronischer Ressourcen im DFG-geförderten System der „Fachinformationsdienste für die Wissenschaft“ einen Zentralen Nachweis mit Informationen zu allen verfügbaren FID-Lizenzen aufgebaut. Der Artikel präsentiert die damit verbundenen konzeptionellen Überlegungen sowie die Festlegungen zur Umsetzung. Anhand von Workflows, Dokumentation und Qualitätsmanagement wird veranschaulicht, wie das Datenmanagement für den Zentralen Nachweis umgesetzt wurde.
    Dokument ansehen Zusammenfassung
  • Zeitschriftenartikel

    JazzCats: Navigating an RDF triplestore of integrated performance metadata 

    Bangert, Daniel; Nurmikko-Fuller, Terhi; Downie, J. Stephen; Hao, Yun
    ACM Press: New York, New York, USA, 2018
    Applying Linked Data techniques to musical metadata can facilitate new paths of musicological inquiry. JazzCats: Jazz Collection of Aggregated Triples is a prototype project interlinking four discrete jazz performance datasets and external sources as references. Tabular, relational, and graph legacy datasets have necessitated different RDF production and ingestion workflows to support scholarly study of performance traditions. This paper highlights critical processes of data curation for digital libraries, including quality assessment of the ingested datasets. In addition, we describe research questions enabled by JazzCats, raise musicological implications, and offer suggestions to overcome current limitations.
    Dokument ansehen Zusammenfassung
  • Zeitschriftenartikel

    Ten considerations for open peer review 

    Schmidt, Birgit; Ross-Hellauer, Tony; van Edig, Xenia; Moylan, Elizabeth C.
    F1000Research 2018; 7: Art. 969
    Open peer review (OPR), as with other elements of open science and open research, is on the rise. It aims to bring greater transparency and participation to formal and informal peer review processes. But what is meant by `open peer review', and what advantages and disadvantages does it have over standard forms of review? How do authors or reviewers approach OPR? And what pitfalls and opportunities should you look out for? Here, we propose ten considerations for OPR, drawing on discussions with authors, reviewers, editors, publishers and librarians, and provide a pragmatic, hands-on introduction to these issues. We cover basic principles and summarise best practices, indicating how to use OPR to achieve best value and mutual benefits for all stakeholders and the wider research community.
    Dokument ansehen Zusammenfassung
  • Zeitschriftenartikel

    Altmetrics für LIS-Professionals 

    Beucke, Daniel
    Dokument ansehen
  • Zeitschriftenartikel

    Building Prototypes Aggregating Musicological Datasets on the Semantic Web 

    Nurmikko-Fuller, Terhi; Bangert, Daniel; Dix, Alan; Weigl, David; Page, Kevin
    Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis 2018; 42(2) p.206-221
    Semantic Web technologies such as RDF, OWL, and SPARQL can be successfully used to bridge complementary musicological information. In this paper, we describe, compare, and evaluate the datasets and workflows used to create two such aggregator projects: In Collaboration with In Concert, and JazzCats, both of which bring together a cluster of smaller projects containing concert and performance metadata.
    Dokument ansehen Zusammenfassung
  • Zeitschriftenartikel

    Open Science Support as a Portfolio of Services and Projects: From Awareness to Engagement 

    Schmidt, Birgit; Bertino, Andrea; Beucke, Daniel; Brinken, Helene; Jahn, Najko; Matthias, Lisa; Mimkes, Julika; Müller, Katharina; Orth, Astrid; Bargheer, Margo
    Publications 2018; 6(2): Art. 27
    Together with many other universities worldwide, the University of Göttingen has aimed to unlock the full potential of networked digital scientific communication by strengthening open access as early as the late 1990s. Open science policies at the institutional level consequently followed and have been with us for over a decade. However, for several reasons, their adoption often is still far from complete when it comes to the practices of researchers or research groups. To improve this situation at our university, there is dedicated support at the infrastructural level: the university library collaborates with several campus units in developing and running services, activities and projects in support of open access and open science. This article outlines our main activity areas and aligns them with the overall rationale to reach higher uptake and acceptance of open science practice at the university. The mentioned examples of our activities highlight how we seek to advance open science along the needs and perspectives of diverse audiences and by running it as a multi-stakeholder endeavor. Therefore, our activities involve library colleagues with diverse backgrounds, faculty and early career researchers, research managers, as well as project and infrastructure staff. We conclude with a summary of achievements and challenges to be faced.
    Dokument ansehen Zusammenfassung
  • Zeitschriftenartikel

    Dendrochronologically dated pine stumps document phase-wise bog expansion at a northwest German site between ca. 6700 and ca. 3400 BC 

    Achterberg, Inke Elisabeth Maike; Eckstein, Jan; Birkholz, Bernhard; Bauerochse, Andreas; Leuschner, Hanns Hubert
    Climate of the Past 2018; 14(1) p.85-100
    The investigated northwest German mire site at "Totes Moor" is densely covered with subfossil pine stumps (Pinus sylvestris L.) from the fen–bog transition. This facilitates the spatio-temporal reconstruction of mire development, which is based on 212 in situ tree stumps in the case study presented here. Six dendrochronologically dated site chronologies together cover 2345 years between 6703 and 3403 BC. The gaps in between are 6 to 550 years long. Additionally, a floating chronology of 309 years, containing 30 trees, was radiocarbon-dated to the beginning of the 7th millennium cal BC. Peat-stratigraphical survey was carried out additionally, and elevations a.s.l. were determined at several locations. Tree dying-off phases, which indicate water level rise at the site, mostly in context of the local fen–bog transition, are evident for ca. 6600–6450, ca. 6350–5750, ca. 5300–4900, ca. 4700–4550, ca. 3900–3850, ca. 3700–3600, ca. 3500–3450 and ca. 3400 BC. The spatial distribution of the dated in situ trees illustrates the phase-wise expansion of raised bog over fen peat at the site. The documented bog expansion pulses likely correspond to climatic wet sifts.
    Dokument ansehen Zusammenfassung
  • Zeitschriftenartikel

    An der Schwelle zur Transformation: „alte“ und „neue“ Lizenzmodelle im Überblick 

    Hillenkötter, Kristine
    Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis 2018; 42(1) p.42-56
    Due to the global initiative for the transition of academic research publishing to open access, licensing of electronic resources is undergoing major changes. This turning point is taken as an occasion to explore the fundamental conditions of licensing in Germany as well as the underlying parameters for developing new licensing models, and to provide an analysis of both long-established and recently created licensing models. Eventually, the opportunities and limitations of the conventional ways of modelling are discussed on the basis of the newest model, the ‘open access transition agreement’.
    Dokument ansehen Zusammenfassung
  • Zeitschriftenartikel

    Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers 

    Ross-Hellauer, Tony; Deppe, Arvid; Schmidt, Birgit
    PLOS ONE 2017; 12(12): Art. e0189311
    Open peer review (OPR) is a cornerstone of the emergent Open Science agenda. Yet to date no large-scale survey of attitudes towards OPR amongst academic editors, authors, reviewers and publishers has been undertaken. This paper presents the findings of an online survey, conducted for the OpenAIRE2020 project during September and October 2016, that sought to bridge this information gap in order to aid the development of appropriate OPR approaches by providing evidence about attitudes towards and levels of experience with OPR. The results of this cross-disciplinary survey, which received 3,062 full responses, show the majority (60.3%) of respondents to be believe that OPR as a general concept should be mainstream scholarly practice (although attitudes to individual traits varied, and open identities peer review was not generally favoured). Respondents were also in favour of other areas of Open Science, like Open Access (88.2%) and Open Data (80.3%). Among respondents we observed high levels of experience with OPR, with three out of four (76.2%) reporting having taken part in an OPR process as author, reviewer or editor. There were also high levels of support for most of the traits of OPR, particularly open interaction, open reports and final-version commenting. Respondents were against opening reviewer identities to authors, however, with more than half believing it would make peer review worse. Overall satisfaction with the peer review system used by scholarly journals seems to strongly vary across disciplines. Taken together, these findings are very encouraging for OPR's prospects for moving mainstream but indicate that due care must be taken to avoid a "one-size fits all" solution and to tailor such systems to differing (especially disciplinary) contexts. OPR is an evolving phenomenon and hence future studies are to be encouraged, especially to further explore differences between disciplines and monitor the evolution of attitudes.
    Dokument ansehen Zusammenfassung
  • Zeitschriftenartikel

    Kompetenzzentrum für Lizenzierung im FID-Kontext: Es geht weiter! 

    Hillenkötter, Kristine; Behrens, Kathrin; Glaab-Kühn, Friederike; Schäffler, Hildegard
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie 2017; 64(5) p.249-260
    Das inzwischen etablierte Kompetenzzentrum für Lizenzierung im FID-Kontext (KfL) wird von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) für drei weitere Jahre gefördert, um seine Serviceangebote, die Betriebsorganisation und die technische Infrastruktur weiter zu entwickeln und zu optimieren. Zur Wahrnehmung seiner Aufgaben hat sich das KfL ab 2017 neu aufgestellt und verteilt sich nun auf drei miteinander kooperierende Standorte an der Niedersächsischen Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen, der Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin und der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek in München, technisch unterstützt durch die Verbundzentrale des GBV in Göttingen. Zentrale Arbeitsbereiche für das KfL sind die Felder »Verhandlung«, »Modellbildung« und »Erschließung«. Diese drei Schlüsselthemen sollen im Folgenden herausgegriffen und genauer beleuchtet werden, umrahmt von einer Gesamtverortung des Projekts und einem Blick in die Zukunft.
    Dokument ansehen Zusammenfassung
  • Sammelbandbeitrag

    Tuotilo 

    Schaab, Rupert
    Verlag am Klosterhof: St. Gallen, 2017
    Dokument ansehen
  • Sammelbandbeitrag

    New Toolkits on the Block: Peer Review Alternatives in Scholarly Communication 

    Schmidt, Birgit; Görögh, Edit
    IOS Press, 2017
    Peer review continues to play a central role in scholarly communication processes, however, over the last decade the concept has branched out in terms of methods, platforms and stakeholders involved. The paper demonstrates how alternative peer review tools and methods are instrumental in further shaping the communication of scholarly results towards Open Science. The analysis is based on the examination of various review methods (peer commentary, post-publication peer review, decoupled review, portable or cascading review) and review tools and services (publishing platforms, repository-based, and independent reviews). Besides the differences in operation and functionality, these new workflows and services combine common features of network-based solutions and collaborative research applications with varying degrees of openness (e.g. regarding participation, identities and/or reports). They, therefore, represent good examples of Open Science, in terms of transparency and networking among researchers.
    Dokument ansehen Zusammenfassung
  • Sammelbandbeitrag

    From collecting to connecting – the role of libraries in Open Access 

    Horstmann, Wolfram
    de Gruyter, 2017
    Dokument ansehen
  • Zeitschriftenartikel

    Der Wandel der Informationspraxis in Forschung und Bibliothek 

    Horstmann, Wolfram; Jahn, Najko; Schmidt, Birgit
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie 2015; 62(2) p.073-079
    Während Informationspraxis in Forschung und Bibliothek früher vom Umgang mit Literatur dominiert war, kommen heute viele neue Werkzeuge zum Einsatz. Office-Produkte, Datenbanken und Online-Plattformen verändern den Alltag in Forschung und Bibliothek und definieren zum Teil völlig neue Felder wissenschaftlicher Informationspraxis, z. B. im Kontext der Bibliometrie, virtueller Forschungsumgebungen oder Forschungsdaten. Der vorliegende Beitrag vergleicht die aktuelle Informationspraxis in der Forschung mit den Schulungsangeboten von Bibliotheken und weist nach, dass sich Forschung und Bibliothek zum Teil voneinander entkoppelt haben und ein zusammenhängendes Angebot zur Vermittlung wissenschaftlicher Informationspraxis am Campus in Gefahr ist. Um ein solches Angebot aufzubauen, wird vorgeschlagen, dass Bibliotheken sich mit Rechenzentren und Fakultäten zusammentun und die Bibliothek als Lernraum und zentralen Ort des wissenschaftlichen Informationsmanagements weiter etablieren. Dabei sollten neue Wege zum Aufbau von Expertise in der Informationspraxis von Bibliotheken beschritten werden, etwa die direkte Beteiligung an wissenschaftlichen Projekten, die Unterstützung von Eigeninitiative des Personals oder gezielte Rekrutierungsstrategien sowie der koordinierte Austausch zwischen Bibliotheken durch Experten und Materialien zu Spezialthemen. --- While information management in research and libraries used to be dominated by the handling of literature, nowadays many new tools are available. The advent of office products, databases and online platforms have not only radically changed the day-to-day work in research and libraries, but in some cases introduced entirely new fields of academic information practice: in the con-texts of bibliometrics, virtual research environments or research data, for example. This article compares current research infor-mation practice with library training courses. It argues that the two have become divergent and that the provision of a coherent range of on-campus academic information practice services has come under threat. Two proposals are made to counteract such trends: firstly, that libraries collaborate with computing centres and academic faculties to establish services that foster infor-mation practices and secondly that libraries continue to estab-lish themselves as centres of learning and research information management. New methods in the teaching of information skills need to be explored, such as direct involvement in academic projects, supporting staff initiatives and targeted recruiting strat-egies, and the coordinated sharing of expertise and materials between libraries.
    Dokument ansehen Zusammenfassung
  • Zeitschriftenartikel

    Research Data Services in European Academic Research Libraries 

    Tenopir, Carol; Talja, Sanna; Horstmann, Wolfram; Late, Elina; Hughes, Dane; Pollock, Danielle; Schmidt, Birgit; Baird, Lynn; Sandusky, Robert J.; Allard, Suzie
    LIBER Quarterly 2017; 27(1) p.23-44
    Research data is an essential part of the scholarly record, and management of research data is increasingly seen as an important role for academic libraries. This article presents the results of a survey of directors of the Association of European Research Libraries (LIBER) academic member libraries to discover what types of research data services (RDS) are being offered by European academic research libraries and what services are planned for the future. Overall, the survey found that library directors strongly agree on the importance of RDS. As was found in earlier studies of academic libraries in North America, more European libraries are currently offering or are planning to offer consultative or reference RDS than technical or hands-on RDS. The majority of libraries provide support for training in skills related to RDS for their staff members. Almost all libraries collaborate with other organizations inside their institutions or with outside institutions in order to offer or develop policy related to RDS. We discuss the implications of the current state of RDS in European academic research libraries, and offer directions for future research.
    Dokument ansehen Zusammenfassung
  • Zeitschriftenartikel

    Das Kompetenzzentrum für die Lizenzierung elektronischer Ressourcen im DFG-geförderten System der „Fachinformationsdienste für die Wissenschaft“ (FID): Betriebsorganisation, Verhandlung und Bereitstellung von FID-Lizenzen – ein Statusbericht 

    Hillenkötter, Kristine; Huber, Maria; Stanek,Ursula; Steilen, Gerald
    Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis 2016; 40(1) p.33-49
    Seit 2014 fördert die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) den Aufbau eines Kompetenzzentrums für die Lizenzierung elektronischer Ressourcen im DFG-geförderten System der „Fachinformationsdienste für die Wissenschaft“ (FID). Am Aufbau beteiligt sind die Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek in Göttingen (SUB Göttingen), die Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin (SBB) und die Verbundzentrale des Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbundes (VZG). Der Betrieb des Kompetenzzentrums erfolgt parallel an den Standorten Göttingen und Berlin. Die zunächst für den Zeitraum 2014–2016 terminierten Projektaktivitäten werden von der SUB Göttingen koordiniert. Das Kompetenzzentrum für Lizenzierung agiert bundesweit als Serviceprovider, um die Fachinformationsdienste (FID) bei der Wahrnehmung ihrer Aufgaben zu unterstützen. Neben der Verhandlung, Lizenzierung und überregionalen Bereitstellung digitaler Medien bietet es die Entwicklung geeigneter Lizenz- und Geschäftsmodelle sowie Dienstleistungen zum Management der mit den Lizenzen erworbenen Daten und zum Aufbau entsprechender Mehrwertdienste an. Die Angebote des Kompetenzzentrums werden bedarfsorientiert und im direkten Kontakt mit den Fachinformationsdiensten weiterentwickelt. Der vorliegende Beitrag gibt Auskunft über den aktuellen Stand der Betriebsorganisation sowie der Verhandlung und Bereitstellung von FID-Lizenzen zur Mitte der Projektlaufzeit.
    Dokument ansehen Zusammenfassung
  • Zeitschriftenartikel

    ‘Being small is not a fault’: Making sense of the newer generation of German-language university presses 

    Bargheer, Margo; Pabst, Jutta
    Learned Publishing 2016; 29 p.335-341
    International discussion on university presses appears to be dominated by Anglo-American concepts and concerns, passing over many continental European presses that operate in their national contexts. In our article, we provide a case study of German-language university presses that highlights challenges and opportunities when publishing in languages other than English. A common thread across those university presses is their adoption of open access (OA) publishing. OA has become a necessity for them because the combination of publishing niche scholarship and a potential audience limited by linguistic borders serves to create market conditions that are not viable in a conventional model. Consequently, German university presses have adopted OA publishing earlier than many of their English-speaking counterparts and provide a developed example for some of the ongoing transitions highlighted elsewhere.
    Dokument ansehen Zusammenfassung
  • Zeitschriftenartikel

    The Göttingen eResearch Alliance: A Case Study of Developing and Establishing Institutional Support for Research Data Management 

    Dierkes, Jens; Wuttke, Ulrike
    ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2016; 5(8)
    The Göttingen eResearch Alliance is presented as a case study for establishing institutional support for research data management within the context of the Göttingen Campus, a particular alliance of several research institutes at Göttingen. The cross-cutting, “horizontal” approach of the Göttingen eResearch Alliance, established by two research-oriented infrastructure providers, a research library and a computing and IT competence center, aims to coordinate Campus-led activities to establish sustainable and innovative services to support all phases of the research data life cycle. In this article, the core activities of the first phase aimed at developing a modular approach to provide support for research data management to researchers will be described. It closes with lessons learned and an outlook on future activities.
    Dokument ansehen Zusammenfassung
  • Monografie

    Humanities Data Centre - Angebote und Abläufe für ein geisteswissenschaftliches Forschungsdatenzentrum 

    Aschenbrenner, Andreas; Buddenbohm, Stefan; Engelhardt, Claudia; Wuttke, Ulrike
    Humanities Data Centre: Göttingen, 2015
    Der Report ist ein offizielles Deliverable (mit Stand Mai 2015) im Rahmen der Designphase des Humanities Data Centre (HDC). In ihm wird die Angebotsgenese für ein geisteswissenschaftliches Forschungsdatenzentrum beschrieben. Welche Angebote sind notwendig, um Ergebnisse geisteswissenschaftlicher Forschung langfristig verfügbar zu halten und ihre Nachnutzung zu ermöglichen? Dazu werden zunächst einige wesentliche Merkmale digitaler geisteswissenschaftlicher Forschungsdaten skizziert. Neben konventionellen, dateibasierten Forschungsdaten – Texten, Bildern, Videos – treten zunehmend komplexe Datenstrukturen in den Vordergrund. Im Report werden die Ergebnisse der in der Designphase des Humanities Data Centre durchgeführten Testübernahmenen für drei sogenannte Forschungsdatentypen – Datenbank, digitale Edition und interaktive Datenvisualisierung – vorgestellt und die Schlussfolgerungen für das initiale Angebot des HDC diskutiert.
    Dokument ansehen Zusammenfassung

View more